The Natural Child Project, by Jan Hunt | September 2nd
In 38 countries1 around the world, it is illegal for a parent, teacher, or anyone else to spank a child, and 113 countries prohibit corporal punishment in schools. Yet in all of North America, physical punishment by a parent, as long as it is not severe, is still seen by many as necessary discipline, and condoned, or sadly, even encouraged. For the past several years, many psychiatrists, sociological researchers, and parents have recommended that we seriously consider banning the physical punishment of children. The most important reason, according to Dr. Peter Newell, coordinator of the organization End Punishment of Children (EPOCH)2, is that “all people have the right to protection of their physical integrity, and children are people too.”3
1. Hitting children teaches them to become hitters themselves. Extensive research data is now available to support a direct correlation between corporal punishment in childhood and aggressive or violent behavior in the teenage and adult years. Virtually all of the most dangerous criminals were regularly threatened and punished in childhood. It is nature’s plan that children learn attitudes and behaviors through observation and imitation of their parents’ actions, for good or ill. Thus it is the responsibility of parents to set an example of empathy and wisdom.
2. In many cases of so-called “bad behavior”, the child is simply responding in the only way he can, given his age and experience, to neglect of basic needs. Among these needs are: proper sleep and nutrition, treatment of hidden allergy, fresh air, exercise, and sufficient freedom to explore the world around him. But his greatest need is for his parents’ undivided attention. In these busy times, few children receive sufficient time and attention from their parents, who are often too distracted by their own problems and worries to treat their children with patience and empathy. It is surely wrong and unfair to punish a child for responding in a natural way to having important needs neglected. For this reason, punishment is not only ineffective in the long run, it is also clearly unjust.
3. Punishment distracts the child from learning how to resolve conflict in an effective and humane way. As the educator John Holt wrote, “When we make a child afraid, we stop learning dead in its tracks.” A punished child becomes preoccupied with feelings of anger and fantasies of revenge, and is thus deprived of the opportunity to learn more effective methods of solving the problem at hand. Thus, a punished child learns little about how to handle or prevent similar situations in the future.
4. Punishment interferes with the bond between parent and child, as it is not human nature to feel loving toward someone who hurts us. The true spirit of cooperation which every parent desires can arise only through a strong bond based on mutual feelings of love and respect. Punishment, even when it appears to work, can produce only superficially good behavior based on fear, which can only take place until the child is old enough to resist. In contrast, cooperation based on respect will last permanently, bringing many years of mutual happiness as the child and parent grow older.
5. Many parents never learned in their own childhood that there are positive ways of relating to children. When punishment does not accomplish the desired goals, and if the parent is unaware of alternative methods, punishment can escalate to more frequent and dangerous actions against the child.
6. Anger and frustration which cannot be safely expressed by a child become stored inside; angry teenagers do not fall from the sky. Anger that has been accumulating for many years can come as a shock to parents whose child now feels strong enough to express this rage. Punishment may appear to produce “good behavior” in the early years, but always at a high price, paid by parents and by society as a whole, as the child enters adolescence and early adulthood.
7. Spanking on the buttocks, an erogenous zone in childhood, can create in the child’s mind an association between pain and sexual pleasure, and lead to difficulties in adulthood. “Spanking wanted” ads in alternative newspapers attest to the sad consequences of this confusion of pain and pleasure. If a child receives little parental attention except when being punished, this will further merge the concepts of pain and pleasure in the child’s mind. A child in this situation will have little self-esteem, believing he deserves nothing better. For more on this topic, see “The Sexual Dangers of Spanking Children” (also in French).
8. Even relatively moderate spanking can be physically dangerous. Blows to the lower end of the spinal column send shock waves along the length of the spine, and may injure the child. The prevalence of lower back pain among adults in our society may well have its origins in childhood punishment. Some children have become paralyzed through nerve damage from spanking, and some have died after mild paddlings, due to undiagnosed medical complications.
9. Physical punishment gives the dangerous and unfair message that “might makes right”, that it is permissible to hurt someone else, provided they are smaller and less powerful than you are. The child then concludes that it is permissible to mistreat younger or smaller children. When he becomes an adult, he can feel little compassion for those less fortunate than he is, and fears those who are more powerful. This will hinder the establishment of meaningful relationships so essential to an emotionally fulfilling life.
10. Because children learn through parental modeling, physical punishment gives the message that hitting is an appropriate way to express feelings and to solve problems. If a child does not observe a parent solving problems in a creative and humane way, it can be difficult for him to learn to do this himself. For this reason, unskilled parenting often continues into the next generation.
Gentle instruction, supported by a strong foundation of love and respect, is the only truly effective way to bring about commendable behavior based on strong inner values, instead of superficially “good” behavior based only on fear.
1 Bolivia (2014), Brazil (2014), Malta (2014), Honduras (2013), TFYR Macedonia (2013), South Sudan (2011), Albania (2010), Congo, Republic of (2010), Kenya (2010), Tunisia (2010), Poland (2010), Liechtenstein (2008), Luxembourg (2008), Republic of Moldova (2008), Costa Rica (2008), Togo (2007), Spain (2007), Venezuela (2007), Uruguay (2007), Portugal (2007), New Zealand (2007), Netherlands (2007), Greece (2006), Hungary (2005), Romania (2004), Ukraine (2004), Iceland (2003), Turkmenistan (2002), Germany (2000), Israel (2000), Bulgaria (2000), Croatia (1999), Latvia (1998), Denmark (1997), Cyprus (1994), Austria (1989), Norway (1987), Finland (1983), Sweden (1979). (Source: Global Initiative to End Corporal Punishment of Children)
2 EPOCH Worldwide, 77 Holloway Road, London N78JZ UK
3 Personal communication.An earlier version of this article appeared as Appendix D in Alice Miller’s book Breaking Down the Wall of Silence (New York: Penguin USA, new edition 1997).
- Project NoSpank
- The No Spanking Page
- Alice Miller Library
- Books by Alice Miller
- Punishment Does Not Work
- “Every Smack is a Humiliation – A Manifesto” by Alice Miller, Ph.D.
- “The Sexual Dangers of Spanking Children” by Tom Johnson
- “The Influence of Corporal Punishment on Crime” By Adah Maurer, Ph.D. and James S. Wallerstein
- “The Bible and the Rod” By Adah Maurer, Ph.D. and James S. Wallerstein
- “Spanking and the Wall of Silence” (excerpt from Breaking Down the Wall of Silence by Alice Miller)
- “Hitting people is wrong – and children are people too” by EPOCH staff
- “John Bradshaw on Spanking” (Excerpt from “The Bradshaw Connection”)
- “Spanking: a shortcut to nowhere…” by Penelope Leach, Ph.D.
Jan Hunt, M.Sc., offers phone counseling worldwide, with a focus on parenting, unschooling, and personal matters. She is the Director of The Natural Child Project and author of The Natural Child: Parenting from the Heart and A Gift for Baby.